[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gsc 717-1091

To: Tass <tass@listserv.wwa.com>
Subject: Re: gsc 717-1091
From: Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:03:21 -0600
In-Reply-To: <E759CA86-49EE-11D8-81E3-000A95C4DF7E@bitstream.net>
References: <A948634C-3332-11D8-909D-000A95C4DF7E@bitstream.net> <E759CA86-49EE-11D8-81E3-000A95C4DF7E@bitstream.net>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

I got a second night and it doesn't quite phase right with Patrick's 
initial period. The data is linked off this page if anyone feels like 
looking for a period:

http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/gsc717-1091/

It's right around 0.33 days. Patrick has 0.3321 as an initial period 
from TASS/ASAS data. For my two consecutive nights, a period of 0.337 
works a lot better but doesn't phase the TASS data.

Cheers,
Michael Koppelman
http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gsc 717-1091
  - From: Doug Welch <welch@physics.mcmaster.ca>

References:
- Re: gsc 717-1091
  - From: Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>

Prev by Date: The Struggle
Next by Date: Re: gsc 717-1091
Prev by thread: Re: gsc 717-1091
Next by thread: Re: gsc 717-1091
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread