[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Looking at Data

To: tdroege2@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Looking at Data
From: Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:55:55 -0500
Cc: tass <tass@listserv.wwa.com>
In-reply-to: <410-220038226223812281@earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

Yeah, if we picked the most interesting stars from the known stars 
even, we might have data that is publishable, for fine tuning their 
periods and such. It would be especially nice if we have known 
variables that are sampled at a nice interval for their period.

Lot's to do for the database divers out there!

Michael

On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 05:38 PM, Thomas Droege wrote:

> Sigh!  I was hoping for more new variables.  However, the above
> demonstrates that the data is not complete junk.  Looks like we will
> confirm a lot of long period variables when we get more data. 
>

References:
- Looking at Data
  - From: Thomas Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Looking at Data
Next by Date: RE: A type variable at 17 57 29.6 +36 08 35 (2000)
Prev by thread: Looking at Data
Next by thread: RE: A type variable at 17 57 29.6 +36 08 35 (2000)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread