[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Data Quality

To: TASS <tass@listserv.wwa.com>
Subject: Re: Data Quality
From: Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:21:02 -0600
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20030602175941.00a79860@pop.earthlink.net>
Organization: Starlight Vision, LLC.
References: <200306022208.SAA30805@a188-l009.rit.edu><5.0.0.25.2.20030602175941.00a79860@pop.earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:39:13 -0500
Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net> said something like:

> anything that I can do later.  They are much more useful.  Rob at a dark 
> location may have a completely different set of problems.  I am very 
> interested to hear what mag he can detect with a 90 second exposure.  I bet 
> he beats me by a mag.  Rob, possibly you can send me a CD of images and I 
> can process them through Michael's pipeline for comparison?
> 
 
I'd be happy to.  If I ever get a clear night again (I wasn't complaining that much when we were in a drought!), I'll run with 90 second exposures.  I'd been running with 60 second ones so I wouldn't have to worry as much about crowding.  Do any of your machines have a DVD reader?  That would be my preference.  Then you can reduce a whole night, and show me how bad my reductions are...

My images are unsigned rather than signed, so I need to do a little work, but I've been saying that for a while, and just need to do it.

Just like building a lense shield, that I have not done yet...

Later,
Rob

-- 
O_

PGP signature

References:
- Re: Data Processing Switch
  - From: Stupendous Man <richmond@a188-l009.rit.edu>
- Data Quality
  - From: Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Data Processing Switch
Next by Date: Re: Databases, was Data Processing Switch
Prev by thread: Data Quality
Next by thread: Re: Data Processing Switch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread