[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another New One?

To: richmond@a188-l009.rit.edu
Subject: Re: Another New One?
From: Paul Repacholi <prep@prep.synonet.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 16:43:40 +0800
CC: tass@listserv.wwa.com
In-reply-to: <200205270648.CAA31809@a188-l009.rit.edu> (message fromStupendous Man on Mon, 27 May 2002 02:48:53 -0400)
References: <200205270648.CAA31809@a188-l009.rit.edu>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

Oh, this brings up a point I have been wondering about. What is the
current `state of the art' in Photometry? and should a set of
Photometry units be considered for following up on possible Variables?

Michael, any thoughts on this?

-- 
Paul Repacholi                               1 Crescent Rd.,
+61 (08) 9257-1001                           Kalamunda.
                                             West Australia 6076
Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.
EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.

References:
- Re: Another New One?
  - From: Stupendous Man <richmond@a188-l009.rit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: GCVS checking script
Next by Date: Re: Another New One?
Prev by thread: Re: Another New One?
Next by thread: Re: Another New One?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread